Tuesday, August 13, 2013
Monday, August 12, 2013
Friday, August 9, 2013
The Perspective Hinge
“Perspective
Hinge”
Our
profession of chose hinges on the ability for us to make a building that works.
From the start of civilization it we have been trying to figure out how to
protect our self and make things easier. And as technology advances and
something new comes along we have advanced with it. So, why should technology
be any different? With a technology that allows us to build quicker, cheaper,
and more environmentally responsible, we should be advancing in architecture.
Gomez and Pelletier talk a lot about the organization of architecture drawings
and how the right perspective/drawing can tell the whole story. The way
something is represented can make a big difference in how the object is viewed
and understood. With our advances in technology the design and concept can all
be viewed at once making the process more efficient. With efficiency comes a
better understanding of architecture, not just by the architect, but also by
the client, community or general public. It allows us to represent our idea in
varieties of forms in fashions all in one small screen or space. Architecture
hinges on the perspective of a future that involves the use of technology to
advance the field.
Wednesday, August 7, 2013
Tuesday, August 6, 2013
Sunday, August 4, 2013
Friday, August 2, 2013
Thursday, August 1, 2013
Changing Education to Push Architecture
AIA
Report on Integrated Pratice
“Straightforward
supply and demand system”
The
article talks about how in order for the architecture community to catch up,
BIM must become commonplace in education. The school must think how it can keep
up with the changing environment and architectural thinking. It must build a
curriculum that integrates this new technology and replaces failing/outdated
parts. We must think about the changing needs and persona of the architecture
firm. Cheng hints on the fact that schools should start to focus more on the
parts of architecture that are changing at a faster rate then dwell on the
parts that are growing old. Again,
I refer to the University of Maryland and how the school as not abandoned their
original focus, but adapted to the changing architectural environment.
However,
Cheng does hint at the fact that everything is not perfect. And even though BIM
will help the architecture world, we should not just abandon everything else.
Because when you become blinded by one thing you forget to look at everything
else.
This
article points out how the architecture will start to catch up with everyone
else. It must start in our education and how we are taught. We can’t be taught
everything in school but we should be taught the important parts. School should
focus more on the parts that are ever changing and less on the ones that are
outdated. However, that doesn’t me abandon those ideas. A stronger, more
strategic curriculum should give architecture the push to catch up.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
































