AIA
Report on Integrated Practice
“Paving
the Cowpath” and “A Healthy Disruption”
Bedrick
and Rinella make a great point to start this report off. The old practices that
the architects of today still do are like “paving the cowpath.” The old method
took a developed process and broke it down in order for the next person to
build it back up again. The process went from 3d to 2D, elapsed time in the
middle, back to 3D and back to 2D again. With the process being taken apart and
rebuilt every time it passed between architects, engineers, or construction
workers.
With
BIM this process is eliminated due to the fact that it can do everything faster
and cheaper. BIM gives you the ability to calculate construction/material cost,
test loads, and understand the all aspects at once. It makes the
“cowpath” obsolete.
So the
article basically says that BIM creates its own process, one that is faster and
less messy then the old process.
Jordani
article supports the things Bedrick and Rinella or saying by even putting a
good spin on disruption. He says that BIM should be viewed as a disruption that
will start to put a fragment industry back together. It will not only change
the process but it will change the business side. It will allow for the
different part of the construction industry to work closer, maybe even under
the same roof. It will boost the need for the technology and the need for even
better technology.
He does
state that this won’t completely fix this problem, but it will generate the
ignition needed to fuel the fire. It will take the implementation of it in
schools to help further the growth of BIM in the industry.
So why
can’t parts of the industry the benefits of BIM and the deficiency of the old
process?








